in ,

Operation Amotekun Not Illegal: A Reply To Attorney General, Malami By Festus Ogun

Frankly speaking, it appears the learned Attorney General is more political than legal on this issue. I really cannot understand why the AGF will be quick to declare illegal Operation Amotekun and would shun his eyes away from the Hisbah Police (a state police), Joint Task Force and other security agencies in the country, particularly in the north.

Amotekun Illegal, Amotekun

Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr Abubakar Malami, has described as illegal the newly launched South-West security outfit codenamed, Amotekun. The chief law officer, acting on behalf of the Federal Government, strongly posited that “no state government, whether singly or in a group has the legal right and competence to establish any form of organisation or agency for the defence of Nigeria or any of its constituent parts”.

This development, expectedly, did not go well with many Nigerians and has been a subject of hot debates and controversies. Therefore, in this unsolicited but imperative legal opinion, efforts would be made to dissect the legal position of the Federal Government on Amotekun and other ancillary matters arising therefrom.

It is crucial to clearly state the two major grounds upon which Mr Malami declared Amotekun as illegal. One, he said the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), herein referred to as “the Constitution”, established the Army, Navy and Air Force, Police, et. al and consequently, no state has the right in law to establish any form of security organization for the defence of Nigeria or any of its part. He cited Item 45 of the Second Schedule of the constitution. Two, he argued that his office was not consulted on the matter. That if the South-West governors had consulted, he would have provided proper “guidance” that will help avoid the “illegality”.

On the first ground, it is a truism that the “police and other security agencies established by law” are exclusively the business of the Federal Government as provided under the Item 45 of the Second Schedule of the 1999 constitution.

The question that follows, therefore, is: is Operation Amotekun a form of state police abhorred by our constitution? Well, during the official launch of the Operation, the answer to this important poser was lucidly given. It was Arakunrin Rotimi Akeredolu, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, and the executive Governor of Ondo State, who made it abundantly clear that “Operation Amotekun is not an alternative to the Police Force but (a) complement conventional security outfit”. In other words, Operation Amotekun is simply a local intelligence gathering outfit. Being a complement to the Nigerian Police by way of native intelligence gathering is not illegal under our constitution or any law whatsoever. Operation Amotekun is, therefore, not only constitutional but highly patriotic. Anyone in doubt about this may read together the effect of the provision of Sections 24(e) and 14(2)(b) of the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

To further buttress this point that Operation Amotekun doesn’t run contrary to any written law in Nigeria, Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State made it known that the personnel of the operation would bear no arm. The outfit was simply an intelligence gathering one which would help the police in no small measure to bring about peace and orderliness in our country. So, if Section 14(2)(b) of the 1999 constitution provides that the “the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government”, it is not out of place or illegal for the government of states in a region to come together and establish an intelligence gathering outfit which will aid and complement the efforts of the Nigerian Police Force in achieving that purpose.

Therefore, it is important to respectfully state that it only appears the Attorney-General of the Federation seems not to be abreast of what Amotekun is all about before making the pronouncement. The position of the law canvassed by the learned Attorney General, most humbly, only apply to state policing and other security agencies established by law and not a native intelligence gathering outfit. If Mr Malami was patient enough to get abreast of what the operation is about, he wouldn’t have arrived at that hasty and erroneous conclusion.

Let us even assume without conceding that Operation Amotekun is “illegal”, we are of the humble opinion that it doesn’t lie in the mouth of the learned AGF to declare it as same. It is only the court that has the inherent power and constitutional jurisdiction to pronounce Operation Amotekun as illegal and unconstitutional.

On the second ground, it is rather surprising that the learned Attorney-General of the Federation expected the South-West governors to consult him for advice, guidance and directive. It is improper for the AGF to have that expectation because: one, it is not a requirement of law and two because it is not the AGF who will dictate to the governors the best way to implement their constitutional mandate to secure the lives and properties of their people. Making such a consultation is quite unnecessary and alien to our polity. It shows clearly the AGF seem to be arrogating too much powers to himself.

Beyond the legalese, it must be emphasised that this back and forth on Amotekun would have been needless and avoidable if ours was a true federal system. The present federal structure is just too faulty and unsustainable. The fallacious federalism we practice in Nigeria is dubious, fictitious and fraudulent. If the true federalism is what we indeed practice, I bet this issue would not have arisen at all.

Additionally, this sad situation is only a quick reminder that this centralised policing system is inefficient, weak and unsustainable in a federal system. There would have been no need for Operation Amotekun in the first place if our security agencies have not failed in their primary duty to safeguard the lives and properties of the citizens. With the growing rate of banditry, kidnapping, herdsmen attacks, terrorism and others, one would expect a strong and efficient policing system. What do one expect the helpless citizens to do when the state security has failed? Self-help and self-defence, provided for under Section 33(2)(a), which is inimical to the corporate existence of the country.

Frankly speaking, it appears the learned Attorney General is more political than legal on this issue. I really cannot understand why the AGF will be quick to declare illegal Operation Amotekun and would shun his eyes away from the Hisbah Police (a state police), Joint Task Force and other security agencies in the country, particularly in the north. It was in the news recently that Hisbah Police even had the gut to arrest an officer of the Nigerian Police Force. Like an average Marlian, the AGF decided to “look away” on all this but left no stone unturned is “illegalising” Amotekun. We must be curious!

Although I am not an ethnicist, I make bold to say there is a growing rate of social and political inequality in the country. Yes, I know verily that it is improper to justify a ‘wrong’ by making reference to another wrong elsewhere. The attitude of the AGF, condemning one and maintaining a bias neutrality on the other, is at best hypocritical and a show of one-sidedness. This unfairness and biasness should give all desirous of the continuous existence of Nigeria a cause to worry.

In conclusion, Operation Amotekun has its many flaws that must be quickly remedied by the relevant parties. First, it is merely a reactionary initiative and that is precarious. Again, the stakeholders in charge were beclouded by emotions and were in a rush while birthing the idea without necessarily dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s. It is uncontestable that the initiative is a great one but the planning and implementation were so poor. Be that as it may, the idea is a progressive one that must be supported by all patriots. The benefits in Amotekun is far beyond the challenges and inadequacies.

I hereby enjoin the stakeholders to ensure the enactment of an enabling law establishing Amotekun in the six South-West states. Although, even if an enabling law is established to that effect, it would in no way affect the legality of the operation when viewed from Mr Malami’s lens. So, assuming it has been enacted as law before now, it would have still been ‘illegal’ according to Mr Malami’s argument.

I also suggest that the operation manuals of the team should be made public for all and sundry to read so as the initiative not to get misunderstood.

For the governors, I charge them never to be cowed or bow to pressure. This is a challenging time that the initiators must never comprise standard for cheap political reason by standing strong on their grounds and at their suffering people.

Nothing, nobody, can stop an idea whose time has come.

Loading...

READ  Maina’s Recall: Court Declines To Stop Senate From Probing Malami

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

‘Only Poor People Ask Nigerian Celebrities How They Make Their Money’ – Swanky Jerry Defends Toke Makinwa

Minister Of Agriculture Wants U.S. Government To Help With Food Sufficiency, Job creation